Patients with chronic, long-term illnesses require life-long support, management and medication from healthcare providers if they are to live their life to the full. Yet, it’s easy to under-estimate the immense degree of continual self-discipline and ‘faith’ in their treatment required by the patient.
This is bourn out through the statistics, which are strikingly intransigent, and this pattern is similar throughout the developed world, with 20-50% of patients not taking their medicine as prescribed. These individuals are said to be ‘non-adherent’, and it goes without saying that non-adherence has fairly huge implications all round.
Crucially, evidence shows that the first three months of a patient’s compliancy to medication are critical, as this is the period when behaviour patterns are established. After the first six months, adherence tends to drop sharply. So, is pharma doing enough to improve the situation? For sure, there are both financial and a CSR imperatives at stake.
Certainly, the diversity and sophistication of digital and data tools now available to business means there is simply no excuse for pharma not to be in direct contact with patients. The advantages? Better educated, supported, engaged and motivated audiences, whose new attitudes and behaviours result in improved personal and commercial outcomes
There are three main options for non-adherence in terms of intervention:-
- Behavioural approaches
- Education / providing information
- Involvement from healthcare professionals
Leading a horse to water is just the first step
The key with all of the above is insuring PSPs reach their audience in a meaningful way. Understanding why a patient stops taking their medication is crucial, but so too is creating a meaning for them to take it. There is no point leading a horse to water if you don’t let him know that the water is safe, suggest the best way of approaching the water’s edge, how long to drink for, and explain why drinking water is good for him, plus tell his owner know he’ll need reminding again tomorrow. And so on.
What makes for a meaningful PSP?
Understanding what the patient needs is the foundation for any inspirational patient support programme, and requires deep ethnographic research into the targetted patients. Thinking from an ‘end-user’ perspective will help shape the way PSP will impact upon both patient and healthcare provider. Successful PSPs also motivate healthcare professionals: If they understand and believe in what you advocate, they will do all they can to help you reach the patient.
How to ensure your patient support programme is successful
There are four main factors:
1. Clearly define the change you want to make
2. Define the level of HCP support that can reasonably be expected
3. Engagement: Drive visitors to the initiative site, monitor whether e-communications are read, seek completion of relevant surveys
4. Measure changes in compliance and patient well-being
5. Measure satisfaction via positive perception of the programme and recommendation to others
A note of caution: PSPs can act as a ‘lifeline’ for patients when they most need it, but there’s a fine line between ‘offering’ support and ‘instructing’ patients on how best to live their lives. Tone, content and information are all vital to reaching the audience in a meaningful way. Listening to, reacting to and engaging with your patients are actions which need to be fully integrated if a PSP is to be successful in the long term. It’s important to keep asking, “Is this a two-way conversation, or a ‘push’ only?”
Non-adherence is something which is part ‘human nature’ and part ‘lack of support’. It is an issue which needs addressing urgently: Helping to insure good outcomes and quality of life in patients is something pharmas need to feel proud of.